<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Appsaholic is a must have facebook application</title>
	<link>http://facereviews.com/2007/08/10/appsaholic-is-a-must-have-facebook-application/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jakob</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2007/08/10/appsaholic-is-a-must-have-facebook-application/#comment-1469</link>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 03:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://facereviews.com/2007/08/10/appsaholic-is-a-must-have-facebook-application/#comment-1469</guid>
		<description>Michael,

Well, Appsaholic had an API for a while and it sucked.  They've since removed it.  But, really, Appaholic has an API: the CSV files.  Download, parse, and display as you see fit, yeah?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>Well, Appsaholic had an API for a while and it sucked.  They&#8217;ve since removed it.  But, really, Appaholic has an API: the CSV files.  Download, parse, and display as you see fit, yeah?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Vu</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2007/08/10/appsaholic-is-a-must-have-facebook-application/#comment-1462</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Vu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 00:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://facereviews.com/2007/08/10/appsaholic-is-a-must-have-facebook-application/#comment-1462</guid>
		<description>Jakob,

I think the real value of such an analytics tool built as a Facebook will show if/when Appsaholic releases an API.  This would open up a whole new set of doors for other applications to leverage the Appsaholic system.

In any case, I can't wait to see Appaholic release their own app...the competition is definitely heating up.  

Cheers,

Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jakob,</p>
<p>I think the real value of such an analytics tool built as a Facebook will show if/when Appsaholic releases an API.  This would open up a whole new set of doors for other applications to leverage the Appsaholic system.</p>
<p>In any case, I can&#8217;t wait to see Appaholic release their own app&#8230;the competition is definitely heating up.  </p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jakob</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2007/08/10/appsaholic-is-a-must-have-facebook-application/#comment-1457</link>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 22:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://facereviews.com/2007/08/10/appsaholic-is-a-must-have-facebook-application/#comment-1457</guid>
		<description>Michael,

Yeah, but I don't see how being inside Facebook brings that much value to an analytics package like this.  I like Appaholic because it's cleaner *and* more open.  They give me access to all the data, and I'm going to bookmark my most commonly tracked apps anyhow, rather than using Appsaholic's built-in (and very clumsy) tracking system.

*shrug*

They're pretty similar in functionality right now, but as an app developer Appaholic is more valuable because I can integrate it into my app easily.  Appsaholic is a big walled garden, kinda like Facebook itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>Yeah, but I don&#8217;t see how being inside Facebook brings that much value to an analytics package like this.  I like Appaholic because it&#8217;s cleaner *and* more open.  They give me access to all the data, and I&#8217;m going to bookmark my most commonly tracked apps anyhow, rather than using Appsaholic&#8217;s built-in (and very clumsy) tracking system.</p>
<p>*shrug*</p>
<p>They&#8217;re pretty similar in functionality right now, but as an app developer Appaholic is more valuable because I can integrate it into my app easily.  Appsaholic is a big walled garden, kinda like Facebook itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Vu</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2007/08/10/appsaholic-is-a-must-have-facebook-application/#comment-1426</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Vu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 04:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://facereviews.com/2007/08/10/appsaholic-is-a-must-have-facebook-application/#comment-1426</guid>
		<description>I'd have to go with Appsaholic.  Although Appaholic is a bit cleaner, it lacks the most important property - being a Facebook application.  To be able to access this data within Facebook, as you are using/testing applications is more effective.

However, considering that Appaholic is made by Altura Ventures, you can be sure that their own app is on the way.    

"Altura 1 (sponsored by Altura Ventures) and AppFactory (sponsored by Bay Partners) are the first VC funds focused solely on the Facebook Platform, Applications, Developers and Entrepreneurs."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have to go with Appsaholic.  Although Appaholic is a bit cleaner, it lacks the most important property - being a Facebook application.  To be able to access this data within Facebook, as you are using/testing applications is more effective.</p>
<p>However, considering that Appaholic is made by Altura Ventures, you can be sure that their own app is on the way.    </p>
<p>&#8220;Altura 1 (sponsored by Altura Ventures) and AppFactory (sponsored by Bay Partners) are the first VC funds focused solely on the Facebook Platform, Applications, Developers and Entrepreneurs.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jakob</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2007/08/10/appsaholic-is-a-must-have-facebook-application/#comment-1423</link>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 03:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://facereviews.com/2007/08/10/appsaholic-is-a-must-have-facebook-application/#comment-1423</guid>
		<description>Michael,

I'd never heard of Appsaholic before this post, so go figure.  Which do you like better?  I think I prefer Appaholic, although it might be worth the author's time to create a Facebook application for that, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>I&#8217;d never heard of Appsaholic before this post, so go figure.  Which do you like better?  I think I prefer Appaholic, although it might be worth the author&#8217;s time to create a Facebook application for that, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandra</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2007/08/10/appsaholic-is-a-must-have-facebook-application/#comment-1417</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 00:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://facereviews.com/2007/08/10/appsaholic-is-a-must-have-facebook-application/#comment-1417</guid>
		<description>Great review!  Alexaholic (Statsaholic) has been such a big help with my research on the web.  Appsaholic is yet another research tool to add to my repertoire.

Good stuff Michael.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review!  Alexaholic (Statsaholic) has been such a big help with my research on the web.  Appsaholic is yet another research tool to add to my repertoire.</p>
<p>Good stuff Michael.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Vu</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2007/08/10/appsaholic-is-a-must-have-facebook-application/#comment-1416</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Vu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 00:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://facereviews.com/2007/08/10/appsaholic-is-a-must-have-facebook-application/#comment-1416</guid>
		<description>Jakob, thanks for pointing out Appaholic.com.  =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jakob, thanks for pointing out Appaholic.com.  =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2007/08/10/appsaholic-is-a-must-have-facebook-application/#comment-1414</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 00:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://facereviews.com/2007/08/10/appsaholic-is-a-must-have-facebook-application/#comment-1414</guid>
		<description>I think appaholic is separate and came after appsaholic.  Even the appsaholic.com domain name seems to be registered before appaholic.com.  Not sure why they aren't using it though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think appaholic is separate and came after appsaholic.  Even the appsaholic.com domain name seems to be registered before appaholic.com.  Not sure why they aren&#8217;t using it though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney Rumford</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2007/08/10/appsaholic-is-a-must-have-facebook-application/#comment-1413</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney Rumford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 00:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://facereviews.com/2007/08/10/appsaholic-is-a-must-have-facebook-application/#comment-1413</guid>
		<description>Totally unrelated companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally unrelated companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jakob</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2007/08/10/appsaholic-is-a-must-have-facebook-application/#comment-1412</link>
		<dc:creator>Jakob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 23:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://facereviews.com/2007/08/10/appsaholic-is-a-must-have-facebook-application/#comment-1412</guid>
		<description>Is this related at all to http://appaholic.com ?

They seem to be aiming for the same thing, but Appaholic is a lot cleaner than the Facebook app.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this related at all to <a href="http://appaholic.com" rel="nofollow">http://appaholic.com</a> ?</p>
<p>They seem to be aiming for the same thing, but Appaholic is a lot cleaner than the Facebook app.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
