<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google OpenSocial Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://facereviews.com/2007/11/03/google-opensocial-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://facereviews.com/2007/11/03/google-opensocial-blog/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Mayhew</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2007/11/03/google-opensocial-blog/#comment-16408</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Mayhew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facereviews.com/2007/11/03/google-opensocial-blog/#comment-16408</guid>
		<description>I think you meant Mini-Feed.com?  And why stop, or is Facebook gonna sue me (again?!).  I also redirect MarkMayhew.com to FB (my profile)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you meant Mini-Feed.com?  And why stop, or is Facebook gonna sue me (again?!).  I also redirect MarkMayhew.com to FB (my profile)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney Rumford</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2007/11/03/google-opensocial-blog/#comment-11572</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney Rumford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 10:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facereviews.com/2007/11/03/google-opensocial-blog/#comment-11572</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t speak for anyone else. But as a business person I would never take that risk. These smart guys are very aware of this risk. 

The blog is not changing directions at all. It has always been about social networks, applications and trends(until this time facebook was what we centered on; and will continue to be centered on). 

Why would we start a new blog? This is evolving just as we planned it would; we knew the word face has many meanings and interpretations that would lend itself to the face &quot;landscape&quot; of social media.

p.s. If I were you I would stop your redirecting of news-feed.com it makes facebook operate under your domain name in the browser. ;) 

out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t speak for anyone else. But as a business person I would never take that risk. These smart guys are very aware of this risk. </p>
<p>The blog is not changing directions at all. It has always been about social networks, applications and trends(until this time facebook was what we centered on; and will continue to be centered on). </p>
<p>Why would we start a new blog? This is evolving just as we planned it would; we knew the word face has many meanings and interpretations that would lend itself to the face &#8220;landscape&#8221; of social media.</p>
<p>p.s. If I were you I would stop your redirecting of news-feed.com it makes facebook operate under your domain name in the browser. <img src='http://facereviews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Mayhew</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2007/11/03/google-opensocial-blog/#comment-11571</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Mayhew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 10:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facereviews.com/2007/11/03/google-opensocial-blog/#comment-11571</guid>
		<description>I use FacebookEconomy.com, Justin Smith is InsideFacebook.com, Nick Oneill uses AllFacebook.com.....I&#039;m waitin&#039;, I wish Mark Zuckerberg would say somethin&#039; to me!

Rather than trying to bend FaceReviews.com into a name for a blog about OpenSocial, why not drop another $8.95 and get OpenSocialReviews.com?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use FacebookEconomy.com, Justin Smith is InsideFacebook.com, Nick Oneill uses AllFacebook.com&#8230;..I&#8217;m waitin&#8217;, I wish Mark Zuckerberg would say somethin&#8217; to me!</p>
<p>Rather than trying to bend FaceReviews.com into a name for a blog about OpenSocial, why not drop another $8.95 and get OpenSocialReviews.com?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney Rumford</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2007/11/03/google-opensocial-blog/#comment-11549</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney Rumford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 09:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facereviews.com/2007/11/03/google-opensocial-blog/#comment-11549</guid>
		<description>Mark,
What are you talking about? Be real. Only a person that does not understand IP law would use a trademarked name in their domain name. ie. Facebookanywordhere.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,<br />
What are you talking about? Be real. Only a person that does not understand IP law would use a trademarked name in their domain name. ie. Facebookanywordhere.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Mayhew</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2007/11/03/google-opensocial-blog/#comment-11541</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Mayhew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 08:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facereviews.com/2007/11/03/google-opensocial-blog/#comment-11541</guid>
		<description>&quot;Facereviews.com is focused on publishing content related to changing Face of Social networks: That is why the site was named facereviews and not facebookreviews. (the name was actually available when we purchased this domain).&quot;

Sounds to me like a FanBoy that senses the $8.95 he spent on his domain is beginning, in light of OpenSocial, to sense his investment may be in jeopardy!
And I&#039;d be willing to bet that facebookreviews.com, a definate dog of a domain, is available today.....
my bad, I checked, some &#039;tards at 1and1.com registered it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Facereviews.com is focused on publishing content related to changing Face of Social networks: That is why the site was named facereviews and not facebookreviews. (the name was actually available when we purchased this domain).&#8221;</p>
<p>Sounds to me like a FanBoy that senses the $8.95 he spent on his domain is beginning, in light of OpenSocial, to sense his investment may be in jeopardy!<br />
And I&#8217;d be willing to bet that facebookreviews.com, a definate dog of a domain, is available today&#8230;..<br />
my bad, I checked, some &#8216;tards at 1and1.com registered it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

