<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Advertising Model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://facereviews.com/2007/11/06/facebook-advertising-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://facereviews.com/2007/11/06/facebook-advertising-model/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Koning</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2007/11/06/facebook-advertising-model/#comment-18106</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Koning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 03:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facereviews.com/2007/11/06/facebook-advertising-model/#comment-18106</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confused. I&#039;ve had a few ads disapproved which didn&#039;t seem to conflict with their guidelines. But if you look at some of their ads from the big players (e.g. the flashy ads with the buttons that go to some scammy cell offers and have popups) they are much worse but seem to get away with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused. I&#8217;ve had a few ads disapproved which didn&#8217;t seem to conflict with their guidelines. But if you look at some of their ads from the big players (e.g. the flashy ads with the buttons that go to some scammy cell offers and have popups) they are much worse but seem to get away with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

