<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Platform: The State of the Apps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://facereviews.com/2008/02/15/facebook-platform-the-state-of-the-apps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://facereviews.com/2008/02/15/facebook-platform-the-state-of-the-apps/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathy Brook</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2008/02/15/facebook-platform-the-state-of-the-apps/#comment-105452</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy Brook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 02:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facereviews.com/2008/02/15/facebook-platform-the-state-of-the-apps/#comment-105452</guid>
		<description>Are there any Facebook apps that can run a poll on a Facebook Wall? I am a member of a small group on Facebook for www.linktogether.com and I want to run a few polls on the LinkTogether Facebook page. 

Feedback appreciated. I will keep checking back in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there any Facebook apps that can run a poll on a Facebook Wall? I am a member of a small group on Facebook for <a href="http://www.linktogether.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.linktogether.com</a> and I want to run a few polls on the LinkTogether Facebook page. </p>
<p>Feedback appreciated. I will keep checking back in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FaceReviews: Facebook News and Facebook Applications</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2008/02/15/facebook-platform-the-state-of-the-apps/#comment-47667</link>
		<dc:creator>FaceReviews: Facebook News and Facebook Applications</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facereviews.com/2008/02/15/facebook-platform-the-state-of-the-apps/#comment-47667</guid>
		<description>[...] About Us          &#171; Facebook Platform: The State of the Apps [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] About Us          &laquo; Facebook Platform: The State of the Apps [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Smith</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2008/02/15/facebook-platform-the-state-of-the-apps/#comment-47586</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facereviews.com/2008/02/15/facebook-platform-the-state-of-the-apps/#comment-47586</guid>
		<description>Hi Blake,

While I agree with your view that apps need to move to the next level, I think it is also important to allow a userbase to naturally progress to the next level as well;

If all the apps are something irrelevant, and users have installed 850 million of them (as per adonomics), then maybe that&#039;s the current user taste as well!

Finally, yes it is important to develop the next level of apps and many companies have already started doing that. However, if facebook restricts the ability for an app to grow via invites &amp; notifications, even a relevant app will not be able to stand out in the crowd of irrelevant apps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Blake,</p>
<p>While I agree with your view that apps need to move to the next level, I think it is also important to allow a userbase to naturally progress to the next level as well;</p>
<p>If all the apps are something irrelevant, and users have installed 850 million of them (as per adonomics), then maybe that&#8217;s the current user taste as well!</p>
<p>Finally, yes it is important to develop the next level of apps and many companies have already started doing that. However, if facebook restricts the ability for an app to grow via invites &amp; notifications, even a relevant app will not be able to stand out in the crowd of irrelevant apps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DT</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2008/02/15/facebook-platform-the-state-of-the-apps/#comment-47553</link>
		<dc:creator>DT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facereviews.com/2008/02/15/facebook-platform-the-state-of-the-apps/#comment-47553</guid>
		<description>Blake -

Very interesting take, but I think your premise needs to be expanded a bit. I view FB as a content delivery platform - in many ways it has the same key attributes as it&#039;s predecessors, Radio TV and even the Telephone. 

People often get locked in to viewing FB as strictly diversionary, or they want to move it to more a utilitarian focus - in the end it&#039;s the ability to take the 3 most powerful forms of content delivery (Radio, TV and the Telephone) and fuse them into one via the Internet. 

I won&#039;t go into the minutia of why FB has the key content delivery attributes of the BIG three - but here&#039;s a quick summary:

1. Radio (Feed and Mini-Feed)
- Mass broadcast of information, music, and even User Generated Content (talk radio)

2. TV (Photo Albums, Profile Pics)
- Broadbase entertainment, selling (HSN), advertising (Infomercials),  information dissemination

3. Telephone (Calendar, Events, Networks)
- Personal interaction, socialization, event/activity coordination, etc.

The real power of FB isn&#039;t that it embodies these key attributes - but that it enables the *bundling* of these based on each application&#039;s consumer base. FB gives you the mass communication and entertainment features of Radio and TV while enabling easy personal interaction and socialization of the Telephone. 

The problem with FB developer&#039;s today is many are simply building apps that mimic just one of these powerful platforms. Instead they should be focusing on ways to create totally new methods using ALL three!

Until FB developers start to understand this simple - yet powerful, compelling and even life changing capability, they&#039;ll never be able to take advantage of what the FB platform offers.

DT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blake -</p>
<p>Very interesting take, but I think your premise needs to be expanded a bit. I view FB as a content delivery platform &#8211; in many ways it has the same key attributes as it&#8217;s predecessors, Radio TV and even the Telephone. </p>
<p>People often get locked in to viewing FB as strictly diversionary, or they want to move it to more a utilitarian focus &#8211; in the end it&#8217;s the ability to take the 3 most powerful forms of content delivery (Radio, TV and the Telephone) and fuse them into one via the Internet. </p>
<p>I won&#8217;t go into the minutia of why FB has the key content delivery attributes of the BIG three &#8211; but here&#8217;s a quick summary:</p>
<p>1. Radio (Feed and Mini-Feed)<br />
- Mass broadcast of information, music, and even User Generated Content (talk radio)</p>
<p>2. TV (Photo Albums, Profile Pics)<br />
- Broadbase entertainment, selling (HSN), advertising (Infomercials),  information dissemination</p>
<p>3. Telephone (Calendar, Events, Networks)<br />
- Personal interaction, socialization, event/activity coordination, etc.</p>
<p>The real power of FB isn&#8217;t that it embodies these key attributes &#8211; but that it enables the *bundling* of these based on each application&#8217;s consumer base. FB gives you the mass communication and entertainment features of Radio and TV while enabling easy personal interaction and socialization of the Telephone. </p>
<p>The problem with FB developer&#8217;s today is many are simply building apps that mimic just one of these powerful platforms. Instead they should be focusing on ways to create totally new methods using ALL three!</p>
<p>Until FB developers start to understand this simple &#8211; yet powerful, compelling and even life changing capability, they&#8217;ll never be able to take advantage of what the FB platform offers.</p>
<p>DT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Kruger</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2008/02/15/facebook-platform-the-state-of-the-apps/#comment-47204</link>
		<dc:creator>David Kruger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 03:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facereviews.com/2008/02/15/facebook-platform-the-state-of-the-apps/#comment-47204</guid>
		<description>Blake:  I agree with your assessment.  Being new to Facebook, what existing FB functionality has &quot;the hooks&quot; for making new connections between people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blake:  I agree with your assessment.  Being new to Facebook, what existing FB functionality has &#8220;the hooks&#8221; for making new connections between people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Rubenstein</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2008/02/15/facebook-platform-the-state-of-the-apps/#comment-46037</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Rubenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 07:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facereviews.com/2008/02/15/facebook-platform-the-state-of-the-apps/#comment-46037</guid>
		<description>One more thing: I think that apps you&#039;re calling for are out there &amp; need to be uncovered.  Certainly mine (JTW) qualifies as more than diversionary, and has the potential for wider educational use.  To say that almost every app is something irrelevant is reasonably inarguable; it also implies that there are some that are not irrelevant!! Your blog has been an excellent forum for reportage re: Facebook. So with that in mind.. what apps do you think fit the model of quality apps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more thing: I think that apps you&#8217;re calling for are out there &amp; need to be uncovered.  Certainly mine (JTW) qualifies as more than diversionary, and has the potential for wider educational use.  To say that almost every app is something irrelevant is reasonably inarguable; it also implies that there are some that are not irrelevant!! Your blog has been an excellent forum for reportage re: Facebook. So with that in mind.. what apps do you think fit the model of quality apps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Rubenstein</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2008/02/15/facebook-platform-the-state-of-the-apps/#comment-46030</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Rubenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 06:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facereviews.com/2008/02/15/facebook-platform-the-state-of-the-apps/#comment-46030</guid>
		<description>People want to engage each other in a variety of ways, one of which is to share in a commonly appreciated activity, or in an activity that is an expression of some shared interest.   In some (maybe many) cases, this is in the form of a game or game-like activity. 

So, while not a utility in the definitive sense, apps like this do provide utility - they allow users to engage each other and to form new social connections. 

We designed Just Three Words with this in mind. It attracts among others writing afficianados, writers, and improvisation artists.  And they  have forged friendships with each other via the app. In other words, our game has facilitated new connections for users that did not exist in their social graph prior to using our app, and we&#039;ve added significant value to their FB experience. 

This same facilitation could take place within other games that although are in one sense diversionary are also avocational for many people. Poker and scrabble come to mind. As does writing ;)

There are at least two approaches to creating vehicles in which people can create new connections: the first is by explicit expression(my expressed Interests/Books/Movies are like yours, hey lets connect), and behavioral expression (I&#039;m playing a word game, you&#039;re playing a word game and I noticed we work well together, hey lets connect).  Apps can be created, both utilitarian or diversionary, for each of these example cases (among others). 

I think that there is plenty of room for applications of discovery and applications of entertainment; what we need to see is greater imagination behind both kinds of apps now that &quot;What Kind Of Cigarette Butt Are You&quot; apps have probably now been given their death knell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People want to engage each other in a variety of ways, one of which is to share in a commonly appreciated activity, or in an activity that is an expression of some shared interest.   In some (maybe many) cases, this is in the form of a game or game-like activity. </p>
<p>So, while not a utility in the definitive sense, apps like this do provide utility &#8211; they allow users to engage each other and to form new social connections. </p>
<p>We designed Just Three Words with this in mind. It attracts among others writing afficianados, writers, and improvisation artists.  And they  have forged friendships with each other via the app. In other words, our game has facilitated new connections for users that did not exist in their social graph prior to using our app, and we&#8217;ve added significant value to their FB experience. </p>
<p>This same facilitation could take place within other games that although are in one sense diversionary are also avocational for many people. Poker and scrabble come to mind. As does writing <img src='http://facereviews.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>There are at least two approaches to creating vehicles in which people can create new connections: the first is by explicit expression(my expressed Interests/Books/Movies are like yours, hey lets connect), and behavioral expression (I&#8217;m playing a word game, you&#8217;re playing a word game and I noticed we work well together, hey lets connect).  Apps can be created, both utilitarian or diversionary, for each of these example cases (among others). </p>
<p>I think that there is plenty of room for applications of discovery and applications of entertainment; what we need to see is greater imagination behind both kinds of apps now that &#8220;What Kind Of Cigarette Butt Are You&#8221; apps have probably now been given their death knell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Santosh</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2008/02/15/facebook-platform-the-state-of-the-apps/#comment-46016</link>
		<dc:creator>Santosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 06:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facereviews.com/2008/02/15/facebook-platform-the-state-of-the-apps/#comment-46016</guid>
		<description>The links for the Ecommerce application mentioned in the previous response
http://apps.facebook.com/simpleicom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The links for the Ecommerce application mentioned in the previous response<br />
<a href="http://apps.facebook.com/simpleicom" rel="nofollow">http://apps.facebook.com/simpleicom</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Santosh</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2008/02/15/facebook-platform-the-state-of-the-apps/#comment-46015</link>
		<dc:creator>Santosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 06:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://facereviews.com/2008/02/15/facebook-platform-the-state-of-the-apps/#comment-46015</guid>
		<description>Hi Blake,
I share your views that there are no serious applications in Facebook which are of some utility to people.

Just wanted to highlight that we have launched an Ecommerce application on facebook, and we believe in growing this into a serious utility app.

Do have a look at the application in your spare time, and any suggestions/reviews / improvement hightlights are welcome.

We are readying our application for an integration with Bebo, currently.

Just to give an overview, we have introduced some new concepts wherein users can post to select groups / networks only. Features are also provided for bargaining between 2 friends, apart from the usual auction type sales. There is a main Global Market through which posts can reach out to users in other Social Networks.

Thanks,
Santosh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Blake,<br />
I share your views that there are no serious applications in Facebook which are of some utility to people.</p>
<p>Just wanted to highlight that we have launched an Ecommerce application on facebook, and we believe in growing this into a serious utility app.</p>
<p>Do have a look at the application in your spare time, and any suggestions/reviews / improvement hightlights are welcome.</p>
<p>We are readying our application for an integration with Bebo, currently.</p>
<p>Just to give an overview, we have introduced some new concepts wherein users can post to select groups / networks only. Features are also provided for bargaining between 2 friends, apart from the usual auction type sales. There is a main Global Market through which posts can reach out to users in other Social Networks.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Santosh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

