Comments on: PC Magazine Predicts Facebook Death Spiral. WTF? http://facereviews.com/2008/02/25/pc-magazine-predicts-facebook-death-spiral-wtf/ Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:49:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: felix http://facereviews.com/2008/02/25/pc-magazine-predicts-facebook-death-spiral-wtf/#comment-52559 felix Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:16:50 +0000 http://facereviews.com/2008/02/25/pc-magazine-predicts-facebook-death-spiral-wtf/#comment-52559 Yeah, that piece was filled with not-reasonable things. Equating Facebook with AOL because... they let you remove yourselves from their services? It's pretty astounding that Lance is the Editor in Chief. My mind? Boggled. :) Yeah, that piece was filled with not-reasonable things. Equating Facebook with AOL because… they let you remove yourselves from their services? It’s pretty astounding that Lance is the Editor in Chief. My mind? Boggled. :)

]]> By: Daryl http://facereviews.com/2008/02/25/pc-magazine-predicts-facebook-death-spiral-wtf/#comment-51536 Daryl Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:17:05 +0000 http://facereviews.com/2008/02/25/pc-magazine-predicts-facebook-death-spiral-wtf/#comment-51536 Also, in reference to the damned quiz apps: "...At the end of the quiz, Facebook encourages you to challenge all your friends to take the quiz...". Err, no: it's not facebook, it's the app developer. Jeez - who pays these dumbass "Reviews Editors"? I entirely agree with /your/ prediction Rodney! Also, in reference to the damned quiz apps: “…At the end of the quiz, Facebook encourages you to challenge all your friends to take the quiz…”. Err, no: it’s not facebook, it’s the app developer.

Jeez - who pays these dumbass “Reviews Editors”?

I entirely agree with /your/ prediction Rodney!

]]> By: Matt Huggins http://facereviews.com/2008/02/25/pc-magazine-predicts-facebook-death-spiral-wtf/#comment-51401 Matt Huggins Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:56:41 +0000 http://facereviews.com/2008/02/25/pc-magazine-predicts-facebook-death-spiral-wtf/#comment-51401 If he poked someone back and "still saw a poke from the same person", that means that person poked them again. And there are obvious choices to hide a poke once it's received if you don't feel like poking back. Furthermore, the inbox has a set of checkboxes and a delete button, what's so atypical about that? Seems like the article is lacking credibility. If he poked someone back and “still saw a poke from the same person”, that means that person poked them again. And there are obvious choices to hide a poke once it’s received if you don’t feel like poking back. Furthermore, the inbox has a set of checkboxes and a delete button, what’s so atypical about that? Seems like the article is lacking credibility.

]]>