<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 33 Brands That Suck on Twitter</title>
	<link>http://facereviews.com/2008/08/12/33-brands-that-suck-on-twitter/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 02:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mahaffy</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2008/08/12/33-brands-that-suck-on-twitter/#comment-105847</link>
		<dc:creator>mahaffy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 05:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://facereviews.com/2008/08/12/33-brands-that-suck-on-twitter/#comment-105847</guid>
		<description>Ayuh, a newby to twitter, but how about names of the famous hijacked. Sarah Palin, for instance, can't be that many people . . . and the one I THINK is really her hasn't posted in months. And Obama? Yer puttin me on, right? It prob'ly reads like Mein Kampf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ayuh, a newby to twitter, but how about names of the famous hijacked. Sarah Palin, for instance, can&#8217;t be that many people . . . and the one I THINK is really her hasn&#8217;t posted in months. And Obama? Yer puttin me on, right? It prob&#8217;ly reads like Mein Kampf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slide deck and spreadsheets &#171; Open Ambition</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2008/08/12/33-brands-that-suck-on-twitter/#comment-105839</link>
		<dc:creator>Slide deck and spreadsheets &#171; Open Ambition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://facereviews.com/2008/08/12/33-brands-that-suck-on-twitter/#comment-105839</guid>
		<description>[...] but clearly was not effective given the context.&#160; Well, with the same arrogance and ignorance large brands who just “don’t get” social media [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] but clearly was not effective given the context.&#160; Well, with the same arrogance and ignorance large brands who just “don’t get” social media [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dell makes first $1m on Twitter &#171; digital popcorn</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2008/08/12/33-brands-that-suck-on-twitter/#comment-105524</link>
		<dc:creator>Dell makes first $1m on Twitter &#171; digital popcorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 12:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://facereviews.com/2008/08/12/33-brands-that-suck-on-twitter/#comment-105524</guid>
		<description>[...] there are issues around authenticity and inactivity on Twitter, if a brand can find a way to add value through an emerging channel, the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] there are issues around authenticity and inactivity on Twitter, if a brand can find a way to add value through an emerging channel, the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manu prasad &#187; Tweetorial</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2008/08/12/33-brands-that-suck-on-twitter/#comment-105372</link>
		<dc:creator>manu prasad &#187; Tweetorial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://facereviews.com/2008/08/12/33-brands-that-suck-on-twitter/#comment-105372</guid>
		<description>[...] and perhaps do something exciting like what Zappos has done. Just ensure you don&#8217;t get into a list like [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] and perhaps do something exciting like what Zappos has done. Just ensure you don&#8217;t get into a list like [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Step Ahead &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Should Brands Twitter?</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2008/08/12/33-brands-that-suck-on-twitter/#comment-105343</link>
		<dc:creator>Step Ahead &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Should Brands Twitter?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://facereviews.com/2008/08/12/33-brands-that-suck-on-twitter/#comment-105343</guid>
		<description>[...] Rumford has a great post &#8216;33 Brands that Suck on Twitter&#8216; - the basic premise being that most top brands, Budweiser, Disney, Marlboro, etc have either [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Rumford has a great post &#8216;33 Brands that Suck on Twitter&#8216; - the basic premise being that most top brands, Budweiser, Disney, Marlboro, etc have either [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hijacking brands on Twitter with hilarious consequences (and some tips about what to do when it happens to you) &#171; The life and times of Jordan Stone</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2008/08/12/33-brands-that-suck-on-twitter/#comment-105276</link>
		<dc:creator>Hijacking brands on Twitter with hilarious consequences (and some tips about what to do when it happens to you) &#171; The life and times of Jordan Stone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://facereviews.com/2008/08/12/33-brands-that-suck-on-twitter/#comment-105276</guid>
		<description>[...] hijackings aren&#8217;t all that new.  FaceReviews has catalogued a number of other high profile hijackings over the past year, including Disney, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] hijackings aren&#8217;t all that new.  FaceReviews has catalogued a number of other high profile hijackings over the past year, including Disney, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lonnie B Hodge</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2008/08/12/33-brands-that-suck-on-twitter/#comment-105261</link>
		<dc:creator>Lonnie B Hodge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 09:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://facereviews.com/2008/08/12/33-brands-that-suck-on-twitter/#comment-105261</guid>
		<description>Add Popeyes Chicken and the American Bar Association to your list....ABA Begging for votes in a web contest and then not even following folks who support them. Popeyes has tried to be cute and clever, but manage to be pretty unresponsive in conversation...

Kudos to the Chicago Law School folks and to Zappos...Great work!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Add Popeyes Chicken and the American Bar Association to your list&#8230;.ABA Begging for votes in a web contest and then not even following folks who support them. Popeyes has tried to be cute and clever, but manage to be pretty unresponsive in conversation&#8230;</p>
<p>Kudos to the Chicago Law School folks and to Zappos&#8230;Great work!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q&#38;A: Social Networking for the Business Web Site &#124; goWholesale</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2008/08/12/33-brands-that-suck-on-twitter/#comment-105039</link>
		<dc:creator>Q&#38;A: Social Networking for the Business Web Site &#124; goWholesale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 02:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://facereviews.com/2008/08/12/33-brands-that-suck-on-twitter/#comment-105039</guid>
		<description>[...] August, FaceReviews deemed Starbucks as one of 34 “Brands That Suck on Twitter ,&#34; though it was a title it had to retract three hours later. The reason why – a post that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] August, FaceReviews deemed Starbucks as one of 34 “Brands That Suck on Twitter ,&quot; though it was a title it had to retract three hours later. The reason why – a post that [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter: B2B Brands using Twitter. What grade would you give them? &#124; reEngineering Antonio</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2008/08/12/33-brands-that-suck-on-twitter/#comment-104985</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter: B2B Brands using Twitter. What grade would you give them? &#124; reEngineering Antonio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://facereviews.com/2008/08/12/33-brands-that-suck-on-twitter/#comment-104985</guid>
		<description>[...] Note: @IBM probably hijacked by someone foreign to IBM. Twitter lists that you don&#8217;t want to be part of are lists like Brands that suck on Twitter. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Note: @IBM probably hijacked by someone foreign to IBM. Twitter lists that you don&#8217;t want to be part of are lists like Brands that suck on Twitter. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charting the Social Media Landscape &#171; OnRamp101</title>
		<link>http://facereviews.com/2008/08/12/33-brands-that-suck-on-twitter/#comment-104796</link>
		<dc:creator>Charting the Social Media Landscape &#171; OnRamp101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 04:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://facereviews.com/2008/08/12/33-brands-that-suck-on-twitter/#comment-104796</guid>
		<description>[...] What NOT to do on Twitter [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] What NOT to do on Twitter [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
